“It just doesn’t work, and I’m not going to sign it,” Whitmer said on a MIRS news service podcast published Monday. “So it’ll be a long summer. People need to prepare to work here and stay here until the job is done.”
The East Lansing Democrat has spent weeks traveling the state and pitching her proposal to raise diesel and gas taxes by 45 cents per gallon, which would give Michigan the highest fuel tax in the country and generate about $2.5 billion a year, with $1.9 billion in extra funding going toward crumbling roads.
Republican lawmakers have called Whitmer’s plan a non-starter, but the governor has urged them to present an alternative road funding plan, which they are expected to do.
But Whitmer, in the podcast interview, vowed that state government is “not going to shut down, because we’re going to stay here all summer to get this done,” suggesting lawmakers should delay their traditional legislative summer break.
“I am serious about it,” she said. “The people of our state elected me because I believe they want me to fix the damn roads. They want honestly in budgeting, and they want real solutions, not half-measures and shell games. And that’s exactly what I put on the table.”
While the schedule is tentative and subject to change, the Michigan Senate is not expected to meet during a five-week summer break period in July and August. The tentative House schedule includes two session days for July and August.
Republican former Gov. Rick Snyder had repeatedly signed finished budgets by June, ahead of the summer break, but that prospect appears increasingly unlikely during the first era of divided government in eight years.
Speaker: No ‘artificial’ deadline
House Speaker Lee Chatfield has made clear he is not committed to a summer budget deal, saying he “will not compromise the product based on an artificially set date.”
“We are currently spending a record amount on roads and are serious about further investing the right amount to fix the problem,” Chatfield, R-Levering, said Monday in a statement to The Detroit News.
“But if that doesn’t qualify as a fix, I could put her gas tax hike on the board and watch it fail.”
None of the state’s 148 legislators has introduced a bill for a 45-cent gas tax increase.
The House is developing a plan that would devote every dollar paid at the pump to roads, Chatfield said in a recent op-ed, reiterating his desire to exempt fuel purchases from the state sales tax, which is used to fund K-12 schools and local governments.
The pending alternative also would use “existing funds in the budget” and discard a new funding distribution formula proposed by Whitmer, he said.
Senate Majority Leader Mike Shirkey “would also like to see additional money for roads,” said spokeswoman Amber McCann, and “the Senate is also discussing road funding options.”
The Clarklake Republican has indicated he’d like to separate the road funding debate from negotiations over the larger state government budget, an approach Whitmer has warned against.
“If they have an alternative that gets us to $2.5 billion in additional funding, I’m all ears,” Whitmer said. “But until then, let’s get serious about my budget.”
The governor maintains the proposed gas tax revenue is a central part of her proposed $60.2 billion budget for fiscal year 2020 — up from a 2019 budget of $56.8 billion. Her plan would also free up General Fund dollars to fund university operations, which would allow the state to spend more School Aid Fund revenue on K-12 classrooms.
Throwing down gauntlet
In other moves, Whitmer wants to expand the Earned Income Tax Credit to offset the fuel tax impact on the working poor and argues better roads will help motorists avoid expensive vehicle repair bills.
The governor campaigned on a pledge to “fix the damn roads” and is wise to “lay down the gauntlet on this issue,” said Jen Eyer, a Democratic strategist and vice president at Vanguard Public Affairs in Lansing.
The gas tax proposal is “not a popular thing, but it actually raises the amount of revenue to fix the problem, and I think she’s really boxed (lawmakers) into a corner on this,” Eyer said.
But Whitmer could face competing calls to complete an early budget, said longtime Lansing insider Bill Ballenger, who noted that school districts have come to rely on summer funding certainty to craft their own yearly spending plans.
“She’s going to create undue pressure on herself that I don’t think is going to be a plus for her,” said Ballenger, a former lawmaker who served as a Republican.
“I honestly think the Legislature has the most leverage,” he said. “I have never seen a legislator lose an election for refusing to vote for a tax increase.”
Sen. Wayne Schmidt, a Traverse City Republican who chairs a transportation appropriations subcommittee, said Whitmer’s declaration she won’t sign a budget without a long-term road funding deal will not change his approach as he seeks consensus during negotiations.
“We just continue to work on it,” Schmidt said. “There could be additional dollars in there — I don’t know if they’re going to come from her thought about a 45-cent gas tax increase or if we move dollars from somewhere else. I don’t want to put any ultimatums on it.”
Does 2015 road law count?
Some Republicans argue that any road spending targets — such as the governor’s call for $2.5 billion in new money — should include revenue from the 2015 funding law that increased fuel taxes and registration fees.
That plan will generate an additional $1.2 billion annually by 2021 once a $600 million General Fund redirection is complete. But officials anticipate the need is much larger and that road quality will continue to deteriorate.
“Everybody said that was a good first bite at the apple,” Schmidt said of the 2015 law. While Shirkey has said he’s open to new revenue, Senate Republicans also “want to make sure the current program is being properly spent, see what kind of results we’re getting and go from there,” he said.
Whitmer has not said whether she would sign a budget that included fewer road funding dollars than she initially proposed. But when asked about that possibility on Tuesday, the governor’s office pointed to a recently published flow chart suggesting lawmakers should “try again” if they propose an alternative that raises less than $2.5 billion.
“The governor has made it clear she’s not signing a budget that doesn’t include a real plan to fix the roads, and she’s made it very clear what a real plan to fix the roads must look like,” said spokeswoman Tiffany Brown.
(517) 371-3662
*******************************************
Gov. Whitmer seems to suggest with her statement, “we’re going to stay here all summer to get this done,” that she is planning to call special legislative sessions during the summer if the legislature has not completed a budget by this time. I hope that this is what she meant. If so, why she’s at it, turn off the air conditioning in the capitol building making the legislature sweat for a change.
Gov. Whitmer cannot call “special sessions” of the Legislature unless they adjourn sine die, which will not happen. Even if she could, Legislature wouldn’t have to do what she wants. I’m all for cutting off the air conditioning — let it be like it always was back in the “good ol’ days.” Be tough! Be strong!
The Usual Republican Doom and
Glum ! If we just had a Democratic
Majority in the Legislature .
This Corporate bought Mentality would
Dissapear in Michigan . I hope
The Air Conditioners at the State House Malfunction this Summer so
Those Corporate Leguslative Pimps
Sweat and vote for Safe Roads!
Millions of dollars spent for tearing up perfectly good 4 lane road on my Mt. Hope in Lansing by the River just so Democrat mayor can look good was a waste of road money that could have been used for Lansing’s pot holes on the same road to the east that really did need fixing. They took out two lanes to add bicycle right of ways to boot. But alas they can still claim to need more road tax money to “fix the roads!” Way to go!
You’ve got it right, Bob. No wonder the public is cynical …
If an additional tax at the gas pump was earmarked solely for ROADS..and earmarked for roads…period (which necessarily could include bridges), a hike MIGHT be palatable. However, to throw the $$$ in to the transportation fund which includes such items as bike paths, buses (that really go nowhere), trains…the answer is NO. Additionally, I realize the trucking industry is important to Michigan BUT the load limits are far higher in MI than in adjoining states. Heavier weights are damaging. I know the lobbyists will be busy defending their clients but they a huge part in banging up the roads. Get to the drawing boards and come up with a plan. We’ve been through this exercise before…
There are many issues that need to be considered.
The increase in gas tax places the burden solely on drivers. Trucking companies can only shoulder so much of this burden as costs will be passed on to the customer. Smaller trucking companies that can’t compete will go out of business. Everyone benefits from trucking. All goods, with few exceptions, reach their distribution site by truck. Instead of sticking drivers with the tax, why not increase the sales tax by one cent and let everyone share in the burden? I do not know how much a one cent increase would generate annually, but an equitable solution must include all of us, because we all benefit from good roads. Tourism will suffer too, if gas prices are excessive. There must be some creative thinkers in our MIchigan government that can come up with an equitable solution.
don’t forget to build more round-abouts like the last 2 increases