• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • News
  • Events
  • Donate
  • About
  • Contact

The Ballenger Report

Bill Ballenger: #1 Political Pundit in Michigan
All the Truth, All the Time
Michigan's Only "No Spin Zone"
Who is Running for What? Who Will Win?
Can Democrats Seize Total Control of Michigan Government in 2022?
Flint Water Crisis: What's Really Going On!
Politicians
Politicians
You are here: Home / Uncategorized / Countdown on Wisconsin Redistricting Controversy

Countdown on Wisconsin Redistricting Controversy

December 30, 2016 by tbreport Leave a Comment

Less than a week remains before a court-imposed deadline for Democrats and Republicans to present responses to each others’ initial briefs on how to remedy what a three-judge federal panel says is an unconstitutional gerrymander of Wisconsin’s Congressional and legislative districts.

Depending on what happens in Wisconsin, there could be ramifications in other states, including Michigan, on maps that were reapportioned back in 2011. The court has set a January 5, 2017, deadline for the two sides to tell the court what each party thinks should happen next.

Wisconsin Democrats contend that work on redrawing the state Assembly map should begin immediately, with or without the participation of state lawmakers. Dems want any new map ready for elections in 2018 and 2020.

Not surprisingly, the Wisconsin Department of Justice, headed by a Republican Attorney General, argues that the three-judge federal panel hearing the case should wait to order a plan to replace the 2011 state Assembly map until after the U.S. Supreme Court has acted on its inevitable appeal.

Briefs from both sides were filed 10 days ago at the request of the panel, which ruled in a split, 2-1, verdict in November that the 2011 redistricting plan, drawn up by Republican legislators, is an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander. When the panel made its ruling, it did not decide (for the time being) how it would change the map, instead ordering both sides to write briefs telling the panel what they believe should happen. On Jan. 5, both sides will file responses to the other’s position.

In its brief, Democratic lawyers asked the panel to bar further use of the 2011 Assembly map so that the Wisconsin DOJ can immediately appeal. But, while the appeal is ongoing, Dems say the panel should begin the process of redrawing the map. The Democrats argue that the panel may allow legislators to redraw the map but, if so, the panel should compel legislators and the governor to adopt “a firm timetable, clear line-drawing criteria and concrete disclosure instructions.” If the court decides to draw the map itself (which a Michigan appellate panel did in this state back in 1992), such an effort should have line-drawing constraints that are even more strict.

Republicans and the state DOJ’s lawyers disagree with the panel’s decision that the 2011 redistricting plan is unconstitutional. Nevertheless, the GOP contends the court is within its rights to direct the Legislature to revise Assembly districts to comply with the panel’s order — but should wait to do so until after the state’s appeal has been heard by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Of course, the federal high bench is currently one member short because of the refusal of the U.S. Senate’s majority Republicans to consider a replacement for the late Justice Antonin Scalia. Most observers deem the U.S. Supremes are split, 4-4, as to partisan leanings, although GOP-appointed Justice Anthony Kennedy is thought to be “wobbly” and could side with any Democratic argument on redistricting.

A President Donald Trump appointment to replace Scalia might be critical to a final decision that could have national ramifications, although, if Kennedy sides with the court’s four liberal members, whomever Trump names could be irrelevant.

******************************************

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Newsletter Sign-up

Receive The Ballenger Report in your inbox!

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Follow on twitter

Tweets by @Bill_Ballenger
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Upcoming Ballenger Events

  • No events
  • © 2023 · The Ballenger Report · Login · Sitemap

    Support The Ballenger Report - Contribute Today!

    Thank you for visiting! You have let us know that what we produce about Michigan politics and government matters to you. More people than ever are reading and listening to what we put on our news site, and the 2022 election was especially momentous. Your support makes all the difference.

    As you know, unlike many news websites, we haven’t put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism as open as we can, but we need to ask for your help. We are editorially independent, meaning we set our own agenda. Our journalism remains truly free from commercial influence or bias. We are not subsidized. We don’t put up paid advertisements. No one edits our Editor. No one steers our opinion.

    But The Ballenger Report (TBR) takes time, money and hard work to produce. If everyone who reads or listens to our material — and likes it! — helps to support it, our future would be much more secure.

    Whatever you might want to contribute will help TBR continue. Thank you.

    Contribute to The Ballenger Report