• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • News
  • Events
  • Donate
  • About
  • Contact

The Ballenger Report

Bill Ballenger: #1 Political Pundit in Michigan
All the Truth, All the Time
Michigan's Only "No Spin Zone"
Who is Running for What? Who Will Win?
Can Democrats Seize Total Control of Michigan Government in 2022?
Flint Water Crisis: What's Really Going On!
Politicians
Politicians
You are here: Home / Uncategorized / What’s In A Name? For Candidates, A Lot!

What’s In A Name? For Candidates, A Lot!

August 2, 2017 by tbreport 2 Comments

Two polls released last week showed that Michigan-based musician Kid Rock holds a whopping lead in a hypothetical 2018 U.S. Senate primary against three announced Republican candidates.What is really shocking is that one of the polls shows him actually leading incumbent U.S. Senator Debbie Stabenow (D-Lansing) while the other shows him only eight points behind.”Kid Rock” is the stage name for Robert Ritchie, Jr., and it is unclear whether, if he decides to run (he says he’ll make up his mind in the next five weeks), he can use the name “Kid Rock” on the ballot unless he legally changes his name. That’s another story, but it could determine everything.

For the time being, “Kid Rock” can bask in the approbation of two surveys — one by Target Insyght and the other by the Trafalgar Group.

Target Insyght has Kid Rock with 33% support in the Republican primary, beating military veteran John James (16%), former state Supreme Court Justice Robert P. Young, Jr. (14%), and Vesco executive Lena Epstein (8%). The GOP primary poll, taken July 25-27, has a 5.35% margin of error (MOE). In the same survey, Target Insyght found Kid Rock trailing Stabenow by only 50%-42%, with some 8% Undecided/Refused to Answer/Don’t Know. The general election match-up had a 3.5% margin of error.

At the same time, the Trafalgar Group — the only polling outfit that showed Donald Trump beating Hillary Clinton in Michigan last year — showed Kid Rock ahead of Stabenow, 48.6% to 46.09%, with 5.31% U/RtA/DK. The Trafalgar survey had a 3.06% MOE. In Trafalgar’s study of the Republican primary, Kid Rock did even better against his three opponents than in the Target Insyght poll — it was “The Rock” with a hefty 49.6% to Epstein’s 9.4%, James’s 7.1%, and Young’s 5.8%, with 28.1% U/RtA/DK.

These polling results have Michigan psephologists and pundits scratching their heads. How could this possibly be?

Well, according to political scientist Jonathan Shaw, writing in the July-August issue of Harvard magazine (“Star Power in Politics”), it really shouldn’t be any mystery. Here’s the full text of Shaw’s article:

“WHY DO PEOPLE vote for celebrities? When surveyed, voters say that they prefer elected representatives who are not famous for reasons unrelated to politics. Yet actors, sports figures, TV commentators, and authors, for example, frequently win elections.

“Because nothing is more fundamental to democracy than casting a vote, the question of how voters choose among candidates—and the extent to which name recognition influences that choice—is both important and poorly understood, says Justin Reeves, a postdoctoral fellow in the program on U.S.–Japan relations at the Weatherhead Center for International Affairs (WCFIA).

“Candidates often “dedicate considerable resources to getting their names out in public using flyers, yard signs, and stickers”—outreach that is “often totally devoid of policy content,” said Reeves, who has written about electoral reform in advanced democracies, and is currently studying the causes and consequences of celebrity engagement in politics. In a lecture this spring, he argued that even such simple name recognition can, in fact, boost support for a candidate—but whether it does or not is heavily influenced by the electoral system.

“The general assumption among political scientists, he stated, has been that name recognition matters only in “low information elections,” in which voters know or care little to nothing about candidates’ policy platforms. The idea is that if voters are concerned about candidates’ stands on the issues, or their incumbency or ideology, they won’t cast their vote based on “a simple cue like mere recognition. But we know from extensive studies in psychology and decision theory,” Reeves said, that people don’t always use the most relevant information to make decisions. In certain circumstances, they gravitate toward the least intellectually demanding approach.

“Because individuals experience a kind of cognitive overload when faced with many choices that are hard to tell apart, Reeves hypothesized that when many candidates from the same party are running against each other, mere recognition would be more likely to affect the outcome of elections. Faced with a plethora of indistinguishable choices, many voters may abstain; those who do vote may be influenced by name recognition or even irrelevant details such as ballot order.

“If his theory is true, one reason to care about it, he said, is that such circumstances occur frequently in U.S. primaries (the 2016 Republican presidential slate, for example), and are even more common in countries such as Japan, Finland, Brazil, and Greece, where electoral rules can lead to elections with slates of 50 to 200 candidates.

“Using data from Japan spanning from 1962 to 2013, Reeves found that when celebrities ran for seats in the upper house in national legislative elections (which have high levels of intraparty competition), they won more than half the time. But in elections for the same office run at the local (prefectural) level, which are held under different electoral rules involving fewer candidates and greater competition between parties, celebrities won less than a third of the time.
“When surveyed, Japanese voters overwhelmingly reject celebrities in the abstract, so the data, Reeves said, suggest “a disconnect between what voters say they want and what they end up doing in the voting booth.” Electoral rules that lead to large numbers of candidates from a single party, Reeves argued, create the conditions that favor the famous—thus “leading to outcomes that are at odds with voters’ own stated preferences.”

“To see if his findings would hold up in other democracies with long ballots of like-minded candidates, Reeves analyzed election data from Finland from 2003 to 2011. There, too, he found that celebrity candidates enjoyed a significant advantage in a crowded field. He then tried an experiment, asking Japanese survey subjects to participate in a hypothetical election in which all the candidates came from the party they most frequently supported. One group received a ballot with just three candidates, including one celebrity. The second group received a ballot with nine names, including one celebrity. For each candidate, Reeves supplied a photograph and educational and occupational background information. In his two corresponding control groups, he replaced the celebrity with a different name and face, but identical background information.

“Celebrity status, he found, did not influence the results on the short ballots. But on the long ballots, celebrities not only did better than all their opponents, they received triple the support of their control-group counterparts with identical backgrounds.

“And among the voters, Reeves found no differences by gender, age, and levels of education, income, and political engagement in people’s willingness to support celebrity candidates. “This suggests,” he said, “that even a modest increase in cognitive demand can influence the way many people—not just those who are less politically sophisticated—make ballot decisions.” And it suggests that, in democracies around the world, electoral reforms that allow voters to choose among smaller numbers of candidates might lead to more thoughtful outcomes.”

But such “reforms” won’t be forthcoming in Michigan in the next year, and even a “smaller number of candidates” on the ballot may not undercut Kid Rock’s appeal.  The so-called “political experts” underestimate him at their peril.

*****************************************

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Sharon E says

    August 2, 2017 at 9:50 pm

    Okay! You have convinced me. I’m going to challenge Kid Rock and run as Elvis Presley

    Reply
    • Bob Bishop says

      August 3, 2017 at 10:41 am

      Very insightful article Bill, Thank you!
      Sharon – you may recall that Elvis has long ago left the bldg… And Priscilla & fam may be opposed to your humorous suggestion. Have you considered Flavor Flave instead? He’d likely welcome the idea and you’d always know what time it is. 🙂

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Newsletter Sign-up

Receive The Ballenger Report in your inbox!

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Follow on twitter

Tweets by @Bill_Ballenger
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Upcoming Ballenger Events

  • Mar
    31
    "Off the Record," MICHIGAN PUBLIC TELEVISION, WKAR.ORG, EAST LANSING, MICHIGAN
    All Day
  • © 2023 · The Ballenger Report · Login · Sitemap

    Support The Ballenger Report - Contribute Today!

    Thank you for visiting! You have let us know that what we produce about Michigan politics and government matters to you. More people than ever are reading and listening to what we put on our news site, and the 2022 election was especially momentous. Your support makes all the difference.

    As you know, unlike many news websites, we haven’t put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism as open as we can, but we need to ask for your help. We are editorially independent, meaning we set our own agenda. Our journalism remains truly free from commercial influence or bias. We are not subsidized. We don’t put up paid advertisements. No one edits our Editor. No one steers our opinion.

    But The Ballenger Report (TBR) takes time, money and hard work to produce. If everyone who reads or listens to our material — and likes it! — helps to support it, our future would be much more secure.

    Whatever you might want to contribute will help TBR continue. Thank you.

    Contribute to The Ballenger Report