• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • News
  • Events
  • Donate
  • About
  • Contact

The Ballenger Report

Bill Ballenger: #1 Political Pundit in Michigan
All the Truth, All the Time
Michigan's Only "No Spin Zone"
Who is Running for What? Who Will Win?
Can Democrats Seize Total Control of Michigan Government in 2022?
Flint Water Crisis: What's Really Going On!
Politicians
Politicians
You are here: Home / Uncategorized / Is It Safe to Bathe in Flint Water? Expert Says Yes

Is It Safe to Bathe in Flint Water? Expert Says Yes

October 8, 2017 by tbreport 1 Comment

Buried in an article on an interior page in the Sunday, Oct. 8, MLive/Flint Journal under a headline on a different issue is the contention of a Virginia Tech water crisis expert that it’s safe to take baths and showers in the Vehicle City.

VTU professor Marc Edwards, who helped expose what has become known as the ‘Flint Water Crisis’ two years ago, used himself as a guinea pig, taking a 20-minute shower and then a 20-minute bath in the leaded water, according to an article by FJ reporter Ron Fonger.

Edwards’s experiment was designed to measure the effect of taking a shower or bath in water with allegedly high lead levels. The professor first “took a 20-minute hot shower in the leaded water using an ‘ultra-flow’ 0.5 gallon-per-minute showerhead that maximizes aerosols, then took a 20-minute bath in the leaded water to maximize possible skin absorption,” according to a post Fonger found on the Flint Water Study website.

“Human exposure and lead uptake was assessed with 3 sequential urine samples immediately before and after showering,” the post says, but there was “no significant increase/change in urine lead.”

Fonger writes that Edwards emailed the FJ that he performed the showering and bathing experiment because of “repeated false public statements (that) have been made about supposed dangers from showering in Flint water due to chloroforms and particulate lead.”

Fonger reports that the professor’s statement says “every scientific group in the country acknowledges that breathing particulate lead in shower water is not a significant exposure pathway.”

The rest of Fonger’s article covers last week’s story that lead fishing sinkers had been found in the faucet of a home from which a woman had solicited online donations, claiming she had been “poisoned” by high levels of lead in her water.

Since then, the FJ has written nothing about its efforts to determine the “how or why” of the story, or how widespread this phenomenon might have been in Flint other than to say that the woman and her attorney had “declined comment to The Journal.”

Observers agree that it would be surprising if anything more is forthcoming from MLive on this story.

*********************************

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Cynthia Maher says

    October 15, 2017 at 11:09 am

    I would trust Marc Edwards with my life. That guy has proven himself over and over. Anyone who paid attention, did some research, and watched the congressional Flint Water Hearings (chaired by Jason Chaffetz) could see it.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Newsletter Sign-up

Receive The Ballenger Report in your inbox!

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Upcoming Ballenger Events

  • No events
  • © 2023 · The Ballenger Report · Login · Sitemap

    Support The Ballenger Report - Contribute Today!

    Thank you for visiting! You have let us know that what we produce about Michigan politics and government matters to you. More people than ever are reading and listening to what we put on our news site, and the 2022 election was especially momentous. Your support makes all the difference.

    As you know, unlike many news websites, we haven’t put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism as open as we can, but we need to ask for your help. We are editorially independent, meaning we set our own agenda. Our journalism remains truly free from commercial influence or bias. We are not subsidized. We don’t put up paid advertisements. No one edits our Editor. No one steers our opinion.

    But The Ballenger Report (TBR) takes time, money and hard work to produce. If everyone who reads or listens to our material — and likes it! — helps to support it, our future would be much more secure.

    Whatever you might want to contribute will help TBR continue. Thank you.

    Contribute to The Ballenger Report