• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • News
  • Events
  • Donate
  • About
  • Contact

The Ballenger Report

Bill Ballenger: #1 Political Pundit in Michigan
All the Truth, All the Time
Michigan's Only "No Spin Zone"
Who is Running for What? Who Will Win?
Can Democrats Seize Total Control of Michigan Government in 2022?
Flint Water Crisis: What's Really Going On!
Politicians
Politicians
You are here: Home / Uncategorized / Redistricting: Democrats May Strike in 2017

Redistricting: Democrats May Strike in 2017

December 23, 2016 by tbreport Leave a Comment

Depending on what happens with the red-hot Congressional/legislative redistricting case before a three-judge federal court in Wisconsin, Michigan Democrats may decide to pounce sooner rather than later.

Former Michigan Democratic Party Chairman Mark Brewer is undoubtedly looking for something to do now that his client Jill Stein’s effort to force a recount of Michigan’s presidential vote has been deep-sixed.

No place better to look than a federal court in Detroit and a favorable Democratic judge like Mark Goldsmith or Gershwin Drain. That would be where Brewer could file a law suit as early as next year in the wake of a Wisconsin verdict in the case of Whitford v Gill. Brewer would allege that Michigan’s 2011 reapportionment of Congressional and state legislative districts was just as much a partisan gerrymander as Wisconsin’s and that it must be shredded and replaced immediately, mid-decade.

Brewer would want to take advantage of the fact that the chief judge of the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, which would flesh out a three-judge panel on the Michigan case with two other federal jurists, is a Democratic appointee. In fact, after the 2020 census, Democrats may have every incentive to jump the gun as they did back in 1991 and file a federal redistricting lawsuit early in 2021 while that same federal appellate chief judge is still in place.

Bob LaBrant, Michigan’s premier historian when it comes to judicial politics, notes that, in a statewide redistricting case, it’s the Chief Judge of the federal circuit who appoints two of the three judges to serve on the panel. Currently, that would be Guy V. Cole, Jr., of Ohio. Cole was appointed to the 6th Circuit by then-President Bill Clinton in 1995. He assumed his position as Chief Judge on August, 2014.

A chief judge can serve in that capacity for seven years or until the chief judge reaches the age of 70, whichever comes first. Cole was born on May 23, 1951, so he will be chief judge until May 23, 2021, assuming he remains in good health.

Cole’s colleague on the appellate bench, Jeffrey Sutton, also of Ohio, was appointed by then-President George W. Bush in 2003 and will have the most seniority of the active judges and be only 61 in 2021.

If Brewer files a Whitford v. Gill-type case sometime between next year and 2019, alleging a partisan gerrymander in Michigan, the judge in Michigan’s Eastern District who is assigned the case (in a blind draw) must notify Cole, sitting in Cincinnati. It will then be Cole who will name the two other judges, one of whom must be a circuit judge, to serve on the three-judge panel.

Remember, judges — both elected and appointed — are politicians, and no politicians are more partisan than “independent” members of the judiciary. Why? Because judges are the only politicians who can be partisan and yet plausibly claim that they aren’t.

*******************************************************

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Newsletter Sign-up

Receive The Ballenger Report in your inbox!

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Follow on twitter

Tweets by @Bill_Ballenger
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Upcoming Ballenger Events

  • No events
  • © 2023 · The Ballenger Report · Login · Sitemap

    Support The Ballenger Report - Contribute Today!

    Thank you for visiting! You have let us know that what we produce about Michigan politics and government matters to you. More people than ever are reading and listening to what we put on our news site, and the 2022 election was especially momentous. Your support makes all the difference.

    As you know, unlike many news websites, we haven’t put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism as open as we can, but we need to ask for your help. We are editorially independent, meaning we set our own agenda. Our journalism remains truly free from commercial influence or bias. We are not subsidized. We don’t put up paid advertisements. No one edits our Editor. No one steers our opinion.

    But The Ballenger Report (TBR) takes time, money and hard work to produce. If everyone who reads or listens to our material — and likes it! — helps to support it, our future would be much more secure.

    Whatever you might want to contribute will help TBR continue. Thank you.

    Contribute to The Ballenger Report