• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • News
  • Events
  • Donate
  • About
  • Contact

The Ballenger Report

Bill Ballenger: #1 Political Pundit in Michigan
All the Truth, All the Time
Michigan's Only "No Spin Zone"
Who is Running for What? Who Will Win?
Can Democrats Seize Total Control of Michigan Government in 2022?
Flint Water Crisis: What's Really Going On!
Politicians
Politicians
You are here: Home / Uncategorized / MICHIGAN’S JOAN LARSEN IN THE MIX FOR APPOINTMENT TO SUPREME COURT

MICHIGAN’S JOAN LARSEN IN THE MIX FOR APPOINTMENT TO SUPREME COURT

September 19, 2020 by tbreport Leave a Comment

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg dies, setting up nomination fight

Richard Wolf
USA TODAY
Sept. 19, 2020

WASHINGTON – Supreme Court Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg died Friday evening, giving President Donald Trump and Senate Republicans a rare opportunity to solidify conservative control of the court, perhaps for decades to come.

Ginsburg, 87 and in failing health, had overcome four bouts with pancreatic, lung and colon cancer dating back to 1999 but apparently could not beat the most recent spread to her liver. She had announced her latest recurrence in July, again vowing to stay on the court “as long as I can do the job full steam.”

The diminutive New York native leaves behind an enormous influence on the law as the nation’s preeminent litigator for women’s rights, a federal appeals court judge, a Supreme Court justice for 27 years and, most recently, as the leader of the high court’s liberal bloc, where she served as a bulwark against an increasingly conservative majority.

The nomination and confirmation process has grown only more contentious since the Senate’s Republican majority refused to confirm President Barack Obama’s nomination of Merrick Garland to fill the vacancy left by the death of Justice Antonin Scalia. Democrats and liberal advocacy groups cried foul at the confirmation of conservative Associate Justice Neil Gorsuch by Trump early in 2017. That was nothing compared to the outrage that accompanied Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s 50-48 confirmation late in 2018, which followed accusations of decades-old sexual assault that Kavanaugh denied.

Now Trump will select a third nominee, most likely from a recently expanded list of potential justices assembled with the help of conservative groups, including the Federalist Society and Heritage Foundation. The president has lauded his two nominees but has been very critical of Chief Justice John Roberts, whose votes with liberals during the past term on abortion, LGBTQ rights and the DACA immigration program made clear his role as the court’s swing vote.

More: Supreme Court Justices Gorsuch, Kavanaugh display independent streaks

Among those at the top of Trump’s list are Amy Coney Barrett, 48, of Indiana, who he nominated to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit, and Amul Thapar, 51, of Kentucky, a favorite of McConnell’s who Trump named to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals.

Other potential female nominees include Joan Larsen of Michigan, who serves on the 6th Circuit; Allison Eid of Colorado, who serves on the 10th Circuit; and Britt Grant of Georgia,

Replacing RBG:Trump’s short list begins with these four women (and one man)

Republicans have a 53-seat majority in the Senate, giving them the ability to withstand Democratic opposition. The traditional 60-vote requirement for high court nominees was abolished when Democrats threatened to block Gorsuch’s confirmation, leading McConnell to push through a rules change that allows justices to be confirmed with simple majority votes.

Still, the upcoming battle over Ginsburg’s replacement is certain to be intense, with conservative and liberal interest groups poised to spend tens of millions of dollars in advertising and grassroots activity.

Obama entered the fray Friday night, noting that Ginsburg “left instructions for how she wanted her legacy to be honored.”

“Four and a half years ago, when Republicans refused to hold a hearing or an up-or-down vote on Merrick Garland, they invented the principle that the Senate shouldn’t fill an open seat on the Supreme Court before a new president was sworn in,” he said in a statement.

“A basic principle of the law – and of everyday fairness – is that we apply rules with consistency, and not based on what’s convenient or advantageous in the moment…. As votes are already being cast in this election, Republican senators are now called to apply that standard.”

Much of the liberals’ effort likely will focus on moderate GOP senators such as Maine’s Susan Collins, Alaska’s Lisa Murkowski and Utah’s Mitt Romney. The two female senators may be wary of risking decades-old precedents such as Roe v. Wade, which legalized abortion nationwide in 1973. Romney was the lone Republican to vote in favor of removing Trump from office during this year’s Senate impeachment trial.

Etched in history

Ginsburg etched her name in legal history before President Jimmy Carter named her to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in 1980. She won five of six cases argued at the Supreme Court in the mid-1970s that opened doors for women.

“Justice Ginsburg led one of the great lives in the history of American law,” Attorney General William Barr said. “She and I did not agree on every issue, but her legal ability, personal integrity, and determination were beyond doubt.  She leaves a towering legacy, and all who seek justice mourn her loss.”

While remaining a reliable stalwart for equal rights in her later years, Ginsburg had trouble commanding majorities on the court. As the years passed, she became more vocal in her dissents – delivering five of them from the bench in the 2012 term alone, a record that still stands. The closet in her chambers held a selection of her trademark lace jabots, some reserved solely for those dissents.

When the court struck down the crucial section of the Voting Rights Act by a 5-4 vote in June 2013 – enabling states with a history of discrimination to escape preemptory Justice Department oversight – she likened it to “throwing away your umbrella in a rainstorm because you are not getting wet.”

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg dies, setting up nomination fight Second woman on Supreme Court had been nation’s leading litigator for women’s rights Ginsburg’s top opinions and dissents, from VMI to Voting Rights Act Replacing RBG: Trump’s short list begins with these four women (and one man) And then there were eight: Supreme Court is used to working shorthanded

In recent years, she became a folk hero to the left – the subject of the award-winning documentary “RBG,” an opera and a feature-length film, “On the Basis of Sex.” Her praises were sung on the “Ruth Bader GinsBlog” and her initials emblazoned on “Notorious R.B.G.” T-shirts. She took great pride in a bobblehead celebrating the highlights of her career, and she helped to assemble a book of her opinions, dissents and writings entitled “My Own Words.”

On the night before her death, Ginsburg in absentia was awarded the Liberty Medal from the National Constitution Center. She was chosen in part because this year is the 100th anniversary of the 19th Amendment to the Constitution, which gave women the right to vote.

************************************

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Newsletter Sign-up

Receive The Ballenger Report in your inbox!

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Follow on twitter

Tweets by @Bill_Ballenger
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Upcoming Ballenger Events

  • No events
  • © 2023 · The Ballenger Report · Login · Sitemap

    Support The Ballenger Report - Contribute Today!

    Thank you for visiting! You have let us know that what we produce about Michigan politics and government matters to you. More people than ever are reading and listening to what we put on our news site, and the 2022 election was especially momentous. Your support makes all the difference.

    As you know, unlike many news websites, we haven’t put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism as open as we can, but we need to ask for your help. We are editorially independent, meaning we set our own agenda. Our journalism remains truly free from commercial influence or bias. We are not subsidized. We don’t put up paid advertisements. No one edits our Editor. No one steers our opinion.

    But The Ballenger Report (TBR) takes time, money and hard work to produce. If everyone who reads or listens to our material — and likes it! — helps to support it, our future would be much more secure.

    Whatever you might want to contribute will help TBR continue. Thank you.

    Contribute to The Ballenger Report