• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • News
  • Events
  • Donate
  • About
  • Contact

The Ballenger Report

Bill Ballenger: #1 Political Pundit in Michigan
All the Truth, All the Time
Michigan's Only "No Spin Zone"
Who is Running for What? Who Will Win?
Can Democrats Seize Total Control of Michigan Government in 2022?
Flint Water Crisis: What's Really Going On!
Politicians
Politicians
You are here: Home / Uncategorized / Michiganders in Congress: Just as Old, but Weaker

Michiganders in Congress: Just as Old, but Weaker

February 1, 2017 by tbreport Leave a Comment

The average age of Members of the current 115th Congress is among the highest in the entire history of the United States.

And if the rest of the nation was in sync with the Michigan delegation, it would be even older. The average age of 14 U.S. House Members from Michigan is 61.2. In the Senate (Democrats Gary Peters and Debbie Stabenow), it’s 62.5. For the entire U.S. House, it’s 61 in the Senate, 58 in the House.

The real disparity is between the Democratic members of Michigan’s U.S. House delegation, and the Republicans. The five Democratic Members average 71 years of age, one of the oldest delegations in the country. The average age for the state’s GOP MCs is only 55.8.

According to Jennifer E. Manning, information specialist for the Congressional Research Service, the 115th Congress is probably the second-oldest in U.S. history. The average age of MCs has risen steadily since 1951, with just a slight hiccup in the 1990s. That’s probably because of the a high incumbency re-election rate, the aging of the U.S. population, and the first-time election of older candidates like Republican Jack Bergman from Michigan’s 1st District..

From 1949 until 1963, the average age of Republican MCs was slightly older than that of Democrats. Beginning in 1963, however, the average age of GOP members has been consistently younger in every Congress except for a brief four-year period in the 101st and 102nd Congresses, in session from 1991-95.

The problem for Michigan is that even though the average age of our MCs is actually slightly older than it was, say, three Congresses ago, our seniority hasn’t kept pace with where it used to be. The recent departure of veteran solons like Democrats Carl Levin, John Dingell, David Bonior, Dale Kildee, and Bart Stupak, as well as Republicans Joe Knollenberg, Mike Rogers and Candice Miller, has robbed the state of its pre-eminence on the “clout” list. For three decades, Michigan was a fixture on the “Top 10” chart of states with influence on Capitol Hill. No more. All these “giants,” with a monopoly on seniority, have been replaced with freshmen who are already up there in years.

Here are some other factoids:

— The current Congress is the most racially diverse in history. There are a record 51 African-American Members, a record number of Hispanics (38), and an all-time high number of Asian-Americans (15). The number of LBGT members (7) is the same as in the 114th Congress. Michigan has no known LGBT Members, no Hispanics, and no Asian-Americans, but we have two African-Americans (Democrats John Conyers and Brenda Lawrence), which gives us a higher representation of blacks (12.5%) than in the Congress as a whole.

— There are a total of 109 women in the 115th Congress — a record 21 in the Senate, and 88 in the House, a drop of one from the 114th. We boast a higher representation of females in the Senate (Stabenow) — half the two-person delegation — than does the Senate as a whole. In the House, however, we’re sending only Lawrence and Democrat Debbie Dingell, so we’re slightly less well-represented (14.3%) than the 20% standard for the chamber as a whole.

— The number of Christians in the the 115th Congress is huge, hovering in the 90% range. However, there are 30 Jews, up two from the last Congress but still lower than some previous years; four Hindus; three Buddhists; and two Muslims. There has been a continuing attrition of mainline Protestants, who represent 27% of the membership in the 115th Congress, down from 28.7% in the 114th. “Prods” have been steadily replaced over the years by a rising number of Roman Catholics, evangelicals, and other faiths. Interestingly, Presbyterians — who represent only 2% of the nation’s religious community — still boast 35 members, although that’s down from 36 a year ago. Presbyterians constitute 5.1% of the House membership, 13% of the Senate. Of course, Presbyterians got a big boost in the executive branch of the federal government with the election of Donald Trump, the first Presbyterian since Woodrow Wilson.

Here’s the partisan breakdown of Michigan’s U.S. House delegation since 1964, which was the advent of one person-one vote:

Election Year Result                           Democrats                       Republicans

1964                                                          12                                            7
1966                                                            7                                          12
1968                                                            7                                          12
1970                                                            7                                          12
1972                                                            8                                          11
1974                                                          10                                            9
1976                                                          10                                            9
1978                                                          12                                            7
1980                                                          12                                            7
1982                                                          11                                             7
1984                                                          10                                            8
1986                                                          10                                            8
1988                                                          10                                            8
1990                                                          10                                            8
1992                                                          10                                            6
1994                                                            9                                            7
1996                                                          10                                            6
1998                                                          10                                            6
2000                                                           9                                            7
2002                                                           6                                            9
2004                                                           6                                            9
2006                                                           6                                            9
2008                                                           8                                            7
2010                                                           6                                            9
2012                                                           5                                            9
2014                                                           5                                            9
2016                                                           5                                            9

*************************************

 

 

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Newsletter Sign-up

Receive The Ballenger Report in your inbox!

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Follow on twitter

Tweets by @Bill_Ballenger
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Upcoming Ballenger Events

  • No events
  • © 2023 · The Ballenger Report · Login · Sitemap

    Support The Ballenger Report - Contribute Today!

    Thank you for visiting! You have let us know that what we produce about Michigan politics and government matters to you. More people than ever are reading and listening to what we put on our news site, and the 2022 election was especially momentous. Your support makes all the difference.

    As you know, unlike many news websites, we haven’t put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism as open as we can, but we need to ask for your help. We are editorially independent, meaning we set our own agenda. Our journalism remains truly free from commercial influence or bias. We are not subsidized. We don’t put up paid advertisements. No one edits our Editor. No one steers our opinion.

    But The Ballenger Report (TBR) takes time, money and hard work to produce. If everyone who reads or listens to our material — and likes it! — helps to support it, our future would be much more secure.

    Whatever you might want to contribute will help TBR continue. Thank you.

    Contribute to The Ballenger Report