• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • News
  • Events
  • Donate
  • About
  • Contact

The Ballenger Report

Bill Ballenger: #1 Political Pundit in Michigan
All the Truth, All the Time
Michigan's Only "No Spin Zone"
Who is Running for What? Who Will Win?
Can Democrats Seize Total Control of Michigan Government in 2022?
Flint Water Crisis: What's Really Going On!
Politicians
Politicians
You are here: Home / Uncategorized / Michigan Scores High in “Pivot Counties” That Voted for Both Obama and Trump

Michigan Scores High in “Pivot Counties” That Voted for Both Obama and Trump

April 5, 2017 by tbreport Leave a Comment

Michigan was among the top states in the nation in our number of “pivot” counties — those that voted for Barack Obama twice (in 2008 and 2012) and Donald Trump once, last fall.

Twelve counties in Michigan (out of a total of 83) were “pivot” counties, tying us with Illinois for fifth-most in the country. The national leader was Iowa, with 41 counties; followed by Wisconsin, with 22, and Minnesota and New York, with 19 apiece.

Those were the findings compiled by Ballotpedia, an online website that tracks elections at all levels in the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and a number of U.S. territories.

The 12 Michigan “pivot” counties were Bay, Calhoun, Eaton, Gogebic, Isabella, Lake, Macomb, Manistee, Monroe, Saginaw, Shiawassee, and Van Buren.

Trump’s largest margin of victory in those 12 counties came in Lake — historically one of the most reliably Democratic counties in outstate Michigan — with 22.8%.  Obama carried Lake by 5.0% in 2012. Obama’s largest margin in these dozen “pivot” counties in 2012 came in Saginaw, which he carried by 11.9%. But Hillary Clinton lost Saginaw to Trump by 1.1% in 2016. The biggest disparity between a Obama victory (in 2012) and a Hillary Clinton loss in a “pivot” county came in Gogebic, where the swing was a whopping 23%.

Nationwide, Ballotpedia found 206 “pivot” counties located in 34 states. The state with the highest percentage of “pivot” counties was Maine, where 50% of the state’s 16 counties flipped from Obama to Trump.

Nationally, these 206 “pivot” counties cast 7.5 million votes in 2016, which accounts for 5.5% of all votes cast in the general election last Nov. 8, according to Ballotpedia.

Between 2012 and 2016, the Democratic popular vote margin declined by 2.1 million votes. Even though the 206 counties made up only 5 per cent of the total votes cast, they accounted for 51 per cent of the decline.

Of these 206 counties, 57 of them voted for the eventual winner in each presidential election dating back to 2000.

A small number of these counties could be considered bellwethers in modern presidential elections, Ballotpedia says. Of the 2016 “pivot” counties, 22 of them (10.7%) have voted for the winning presidential candidate in every election dating back to 1984. Among those 22 counties, two (9.0%) voted for the winning candidate in every election since 1960. Those two counties were NOT in Michigan — they were Valencia County, New Mexico, and Vigo County, Indiana.

*****************************

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Newsletter Sign-up

Receive The Ballenger Report in your inbox!

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Follow on twitter

Tweets by @Bill_Ballenger
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Upcoming Ballenger Events

  • No events
  • © 2023 · The Ballenger Report · Login · Sitemap

    Support The Ballenger Report - Contribute Today!

    Thank you for visiting! You have let us know that what we produce about Michigan politics and government matters to you. More people than ever are reading and listening to what we put on our news site, and the 2022 election was especially momentous. Your support makes all the difference.

    As you know, unlike many news websites, we haven’t put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism as open as we can, but we need to ask for your help. We are editorially independent, meaning we set our own agenda. Our journalism remains truly free from commercial influence or bias. We are not subsidized. We don’t put up paid advertisements. No one edits our Editor. No one steers our opinion.

    But The Ballenger Report (TBR) takes time, money and hard work to produce. If everyone who reads or listens to our material — and likes it! — helps to support it, our future would be much more secure.

    Whatever you might want to contribute will help TBR continue. Thank you.

    Contribute to The Ballenger Report